RESUMO
BackgroundLittle is known about the SARS-CoV-2 contamination of environmental surfaces and air in non-health care settings among COVID-19 cases. Methods and findingsWe explored the SARS-CoV-2 contamination of environmental surfaces and air by collecting air and swabbing environmental surfaces among 39 COVID-19 cases in Guangzhou, China. The specimens were tested by RT-PCR testing. The information collected for COVID-19 cases included basic demographic, clinical severity, onset of symptoms, radiological testing, laboratory testing and hospital admission. A total of 641 environmental surfaces and air specimens were collected among 39 COVID-19 cases before disinfection. Among them, 20 specimens (20/641, 3.1%) were tested positive from 9 COVID-19 cases (9/39, 23.1%), with 5 (5/101, 5.0%) positive specimens from 3 asymptomatic cases, 5 (5/220, 2.3%) from 3 mild cases, and 10 (10/374, 2.7%) from 3 moderate cases. All positive specimens were collected within 3 days after diagnosis, and 10 (10/42, 23.8%) were found in toilet (5 on toilet bowl, 4 on sink/faucet/shower, 1 on floor drain), 4 (4/21, 19.0%) in anteroom (2 on water dispenser/cup/bottle, 1 on chair/table, 1 on TV remote), 1 (1/8, 12.5%) in kitchen (1 on dining-table), 1 (1/18, 5.6%) in bedroom (1 on bed/sheet pillow/bedside table), 1 (1/5, 20.0%) in car (1 on steering wheel/seat/handlebar) and 3 (3/20, 21.4%) on door knobs. Air specimens in room (0/10, 0.0%) and car (0/1, 0.0%) were all negative. ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 was found on environmental surfaces especially in toilet, and could survive for several days. We provided evidence of potential for SARS-CoV-2 transmission through contamination of environmental surfaces.
RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify the enterovirus from stool samples of patients with hand, foot and mouth disease(HFMD) in Guangzhou from 2010 to 2012 and to perform phylogenetic analysis of the VP1 gene sequences of coxsackievirus A4 and coxsackievirus A10.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 5 484 samples of suspected cases of HFMD which Guangzhou Center for Disease Control received from 2010 to 2012 were collected.Virus RNA was tested by nested RT-PCR method as human enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A16, coxsackievirus A4, coxsackievirus A10 and other enteroviruses positive, and 4 111 samples were positive. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by partial VP1 gene sequences of coxsackievirus A4 and coxsackievirus A10 to perform phylogenetic analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In 4 111 enterovirus-positive samples, the positive rate of EV71, CoxA16, CoxA10 and CoxA4 was 35.1% (1 443/4 111) , 30.7% (1 261/4 111) , 2.0% (82/4 111),0.8% (31/4 111) respectively. Different enterovirus-positive rate was statistically significant (χ(2) = 148.34, P < 0.05) .Incidences of coxsackievirus A4 positive was highest in 3-year old children as 1.3% (7/534) , and that of coxsackievirus A10 positive was highest in 0-year old children as 3.7% (34/914) . The highest positive rate of diagnosed coxsackievirus A4 positive cases was admitted in April(2.6%, 12/460) , and the highest positive rate of diagnosed coxsackievirus A10 positive cases was admitted in August 4.3% (12/278). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that all the CoxA4 stains were divided into subtype A and subtype B, and the CoxA10 stains were divided into subtypes A, subtype B and subtype C. The VP1 gene nucleotide sequences of CoxA4 and CoxA10 this study measured both belonged to subtype A.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The VP1 gene nucleotide sequences of CoxA4 and CoxA10 in Guangzhou from 2010 to 2012 both belonged to subtype A.</p>
Assuntos
Criança , Humanos , China , Epidemiologia , Enterovirus Humano A , Doença de Mão, Pé e Boca , Epidemiologia Molecular , Filogenia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , RNA ViralRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify the pathogen and characteristics on a case of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) caused by coxsackie-virus A6 (CA6) associated with vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) co-infection.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Field epidemiological study at the epidemic area was conducted and 16 stool samples including from the patient and close contacts were collected for isolation and identification of the enterovirus (EV). 21 stool samples from patients diagnosed as HFMD were collected in the same hospital at the same month to detect CA16,EV71, CA6 and PV by real-time RT-PCR or RT-PCR. The VP1 gene of the CA6 was amplified by RT-PCR and PCR products were sequenced and analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The patient showed only HFMD symptoms, but no symptoms related to acute flaccid paralysis (AFP). No EVs were isolated from 16 samples collected from the patient and close contacts. And no AFP cases were found by an active search. A total of 21 samples from patients diagnosed as HFMD were collected in the same hospital at the same month and 4 were found to be EV71, 2 were CA16 and 15 (include the patient)were CA6. Only this patient was found to have had VDPV II infection. The CA6 VP1 gene was amplified from the HFMD patient and 9 other cases from the same hospital at the same month. Nucleotide sequences of the VP1 gene among the 9 strains shared 98.9%-100.0% in homology and 96.0%-100.0% in the deduced amino acid sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the VP1 sequences categorized the 9 strains into the same branch. There were 6 nucleotides changes including U2909A between the VP1 region of the VDPV strain of the case and Sabin II. Results from phylogenetic analysis on the VP1 sequences indicated that the VDPV strain of the case was different from other VDPVs strains isolated in the world.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>This case was a HFMD which caused by CA6 co-infection with VDPV II and the VDPV was newly discovered. HFMD symptoms of the case were caused by CA6. The reason why this case did not have AFP symptoms was probably due the protective effect of IPV vaccine. No AFP cases were found by the active search for AFP cases conducted in the area, which indicated that VDPV did not cause virus circulation in this area.</p>
